America's State Parks - a Natural Stimulus Program

Saturday, July 18, 2009 by Nancy Heltman
Overnight guests at James River State ParkIf you are reading this post, you probably have been to a state park or are considering visiting one. Perhaps you have seen articles that have mentioned the impact the recession has had on parks. Basically, more people are going to parks for recreation than ever before and funding for many park systems is threatened by shrinking government revenues.

Camping Blogger's recent article "State Parks Still Under Pressure" really hit the mark. At a time when more than ever people need to recreate in nature for less expensive family fun and to find solace in the beauty of nature, thinking that parks are luxuries that should be stripped to meet budget targets is a big mistake.

But sometimes how much people love and need their parks is not enough of a reason to convince legislators to save parks from the chopping block. Fortunately there is yet another reason to keep parks thriving during economic downturns that should convince even the most cynical lawmaker - parks MAKE money.

Virginia's Newest State Park, High Bridge Trail, has been welcomed by the rural communities it will supportFor many years Virginia State Parks have published it's annual economic impact figures. This is solely based on Tourism generated revenue to the local economies. Many of the rural local economies depend on the revenue created by state park visitors. Other impacts include local employment and purchasing goods and services from local businesses. The Trust for Public Land has released a new white paper that delves into the many areas that parks contribute to economic well being. "Conservation: An Investment that Pays" should be required reading for every local and state governing body.

In the case of Virginia State Parks and ONLY considering the Tourism impact, for every dollar the state provides to support our parks, the parks generate more than $9 in the local economy. During a recession, the parks are a special stimulus program that generate revenue and improve the well being of the citizenry. While I would certainly suggest more investment in Parks, it is important to note that keeping funding as is will continue stimulating the economy. But, cutting park budgets so they can no longer operate effectively will create a ripple effect in localities at the worst possible time.

See these related posts:
The Annual Wayne C Henderson Music Festival and Guitar Competition at Grayson Highlands SP brings people from around the country to rural Grayson County

Comments for America's State Parks - a Natural Stimulus Program

Thursday, January 21, 2010 by Bob Ray:
This is a response to Nancy's article, as well as her blog in the Main Newsletter. Her's is a very well written and informative piece. More importantly, it makes a very strong point that we can't ignore. We all need to contact our state legislators and the govenor to let him know that cutting back state park services is absolutely counterproductive to common sense. Also, our federal legislators need to be urged to use some of that so called "stimulus money" for this purpose. Let's hope we can save our wonderful parks.
Friday, January 22, 2010 by Nancy Heltman:
Thanks! We found out many years ago that while we have millions of people who love us they don't always see the importance of making that love know to the folks that make decisions as to the fate of parks. California and Arizona are not the only systems struggling. Where ever you are reading this today, if you love parks - local, regional, state or federal, make an effort to tell the governing bodies that you love them and care enough to have that influence how you vote in elections.

Leave a comment





Captcha